The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
well that's true especially you want to take it to the nth degree but you need to invest yourself in some degree of education to at least be confident in today's a world or so so you have to know some of this stuff well and that's something you have to be willing to learn some of this chemistry I mean you have to steep yourself in biochemistry and understand the because the significance becomes enormous one double bond in one of these things completely changes its properties
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.