The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i think they made a mistake in their methodology i think they made it a great school error now maybe i'm wrong okay because i'm writing this up i'll subject it to review and criticism and i'm given that i'm saying every authority in the field is wrong i'll chances are coming out on positive and this are pretty slim but but but the error in the methodology that i think is present is so simple it's decisive and and i'm just putting maybe i'm wrong but my bet is i'm actually right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.