Paul Saladino· MD
it was 80 people there's no correlation between cardiovascular disease
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it was 80 people there's no correlation between cardiovascular disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
he compared them to a group at Miami heartt which is a group of people that had a bunch of of CT coronary angiograms that didn't have elevated LDL quote and there was the exact same incidence of cardiovascular disease in people with quote average LDL levels and people with significantly elevated LDL levels who are lean mass hyperresponders
what he found with those people was that they did not have really any correlation between their level of LDL and the incidence of cardiovascular disease that they saw on a CCTA