The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one might look at the isolated fact that Sarge Cove two docks on this ace to receptor to enter the cell and conclude that it's best to have less ace to receptors but as I just explained the opposite is true ace 2 is a key is really key for protection against acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome and this has even been shown with the original SARS virus
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.