We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
you'll also notice this igf-1 and many people i've debated stephen gundry and many others about this will say igf-1 is going to bump you're going to over-activate mtor baloney gefelt a fish total bunk you guys look at this igf-1 it's less than the average the z-score is almost an entire standard deviation less than the average he's not over activating mtor he's not over activating igf-1 probably because he's doing some degree of intermittent fasting
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.