The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
is that on 2 to 3 pounds of meat a day their fasting glucose was rising it was 95 103 I never had quite that high I think I had some like low 90s or mid-90s and I think what's going on is the gluconeogenesis phenomenon that if that basically your body is saying hey if you're only gonna give me protein and you're not gonna give me any carbohydrates because you're eating a carnivore diet then I'm gonna make glucose out of this and it's gonna be a little higher
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.