The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I've seen some pretty amazing things that that really you know that really shook me throughout my medical education things I've never seen with mainstream you know medications or you know things that were pretty pretty profound and patients who were previously recalcitrant to many therapies and many diets who who got better with the exclusion of plants
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And then one of the final things I consider next for these really recalcitrine cases that aren't responding is carnivore is kind of the the pinnacle