Peter Attia· MD
one of the potential downsides i focused on in the review that is downplayed by many carnivore diet advocates including paul saldino is the change in ldl cholesterol and ldl particle count
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
one of the potential downsides i focused on in the review that is downplayed by many carnivore diet advocates including paul saldino is the change in ldl cholesterol and ldl particle count
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but that certainly raises red flags for me in terms of cardiovascular risk over the long run
people might do a carnivore diet lose 30 40 pounds their blood glucose regulation gets better their HDL gets better but their their LDL goes through the roof and they go number yeah and and they go but I'm so much healthier now one you don't feel heart disease until it's knocking on your door and two you may on balance overall yes be healthier than you were before but you are not as healthy as if you'd gotten all those benefits and also not raised your LDL you would be healthier having all those things and also your LDL lower