The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he said he thought maybe 70% of people got better on the carnivore diet and still 30% of people didn't get better if you've got issues and I thought Michael seventy percent man show me another thing in Western medicine that can do that like they're pretty rare and I think elimination diets are efficacious
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I'd say it's closer to about 60% as I've had a chance to work with more, which is still good. And also keep in mind that that that's in a population that's failing out of other dietary generations. So it's a more challenging population.