The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
when you begin to put a cap on the amount of food that they receive for example when you remove carbohydrates entirely you potentiate a reduction in the total population of bacteria so you can get some die off of bacteria and in addition to that you create greater gut microbiome diversity so you have more competition for fewer food sources which drive down population rates of bacteria potentially
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.