The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but this is suggesting that with adherence the tumor did not progress on this diet and actually regress now i am not suggesting uh that anyone forgo mainstream medical care of your cancer talk to your oncologist certainly this is not to be misconstrued medical advice but i think these studies show that uh carnivore diets animal-based diets at least in these case reports do not accelerate cancer progression i would think they are totally safe in this situation
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yes there are published case reports with a carnivore diet in patients who have cancer these are single case reports there's no long case series but i hope that in the future there will be much more research on this way of eating but i think that even these case reports begin to show us that it's not as simple as red meat equals cancer or red meat and leucine equals mtor equals cancer it's much more nuanced