The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so one kills themselves with a car you know gets to be symptom-free we can talk about whether it's really a cure I'm not particularly interested in that but they get symptom free their antibodies go down they feel great on a carnivore diet right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
take people to people with autoimmune disease let's say so one kills themselves with a car you know gets to be symptom-free we can talk about whether it's really a cure I'm not particularly interested in that but they get symptom free their antibodies go down they feel great on a carnivore diet right then you take another person who maybe they could have done that and they would have got the same result but they choose to do something else maybe they really focus on cultivating more joy and connection with the outdoors they go to your new retreat center that you're gonna build and they change their life in some significant ways they're focusing more on neuroplasticity based kind of interventions because that's what they're drawn to and for them following a super strict restrictive diet may actually generate more stress