The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
whereby you take pictures of what you eat over time and when you go back you look at that food and say well I ate those scrambled eggs this morning and my glucose values didn't go up maybe scrambled eggs for breakfast there's a good thing for me and then you take a picture of pancakes and the next time you sit down to eat if you take a picture of those pancakes you get reminded you know you had pancakes a month ago and that may not have been the outcome
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
integrating the CGM data into a food database to whereby you take pictures of what you eat over time and when you go back you look at that food and say well I ate those scrambled eggs this morning and my glucose values didn't go up maybe scrambled eggs for breakfast there's a good thing for me and then you take a picture of pancakes and the next time you sit down to eat if you take a picture of those pancakes you get reminded you know you had pancakes a month ago and that may not have been the outcome
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.