Paul Saladino· MD
So what we need to be paying attention to is the postprandial reactions. So you really can't get this unless you're wearing a CGM.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So what we need to be paying attention to is the postprandial reactions. So you really can't get this unless you're wearing a CGM.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there is no better way that is basically you are able to do an oral glucose tolerance test on yourself every single freaking day with a cgm
you can get a cgm a continuous glucose monitor if you want to know
so you can see on a continuous glucose monitor if i put that on someone i can see immediately how metabolically healthy they are just by how they respond to sugar whether it's from fruit or whatever
my reaction in terms of blood glucose response to different fruits is very variable
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.