The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So what's cool about what you guys are doing at NutriSense is it doesn't even require a doctor's prescription. You guys have it set up so that people can go and just get a CGM safely, legally and use it even if your doctor isn't savvy, you can then bring your doctor this data and educate them.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, we're seeing people every single day walk around walk out of our program with life-changing outcomes even if they didn't have diabetes.
Yeah, so to check out what we're doing at NutriSense, you can just go to our website nutrisense.io and that's also where you sign up if you're interested. And as you mentioned, we take care of all the headache behind getting these devices, um all the hoops you normally have to jump through, you just fill out a quick questionnaire on our website and then we would ship the device to you and take care of everything else for you.
Post-meal glucose spikes in non-diabetics drive long-term cardiometabolic disease independently of HbA1c.
Wearing a continuous glucose monitor leads to personalized dietary improvements that hold up beyond 12 weeks.
Continuous glucose monitors meaningfully change behavior in non-diabetic adults beyond the first month.
CGM use in metabolically healthy adults induces orthorexic-style dietary anxiety without health benefit.