The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So over the last 80 years the pharma industry I'm not sure who is behind it food industry has done a very good job of programming the general public mostly through media that cholesterol is bad as you're saying and there's this mass hypnosis of cholesterol lowering without really any attention or awareness of underlying metabolic health.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.