Peter Attia· MD
whereas conversely when you look at the emiology of smoking or the epidemiology of exercise like those are so overwhelming that it it it it factors into what we see as the overall causality narrative
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
whereas conversely when you look at the emiology of smoking or the epidemiology of exercise like those are so overwhelming that it it it it factors into what we see as the overall causality narrative
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
whereas conversely when you look at the epidemiology of smoking or the epidemiology of exercise like those are so overwhelming that it it it it factors into what we see as the overall causality