We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Uh, and you know, again, it's it's crazy why there are some studies that were done that were in, I won't say intentionally, but they appear to be intentionally designed to be lousy studies, right? doing things like giving too low a dose of CoQ10, not measuring CoQ10 levels and you know being too short and you know and then they say oh look there's no benefit to this so why would we
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.