Paul Saladino· MD
acrylamide which is potentially problematic from a neurotoxin perspective potential carcinogen etc
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
acrylamide which is potentially problematic from a neurotoxin perspective potential carcinogen etc
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as i said acrylamide is a known neurotoxin a known problematic chemical you can look at websites even the fda will talk about acrylamide so acrylamide is known to form in foods made from plants such as potato products grain products or coffee it does not form a forms at much lower levels in dairy meat and fish products there's essentially no acrylamide in animal foods it's likely to accumulate when cooking is done for longer periods or at higher temperatures
i have a lot of concerns about acrylamide content and coffee i'm going to talk about acrylamide it's a compound formed by what appears to be a mallard reaction uh between a sugar molecule and an asparagine which is an amino acid residue in the roasting of coffee beans and in the roasting of many other plant products and there's a lot of good evidence that acrylamide itself is a neurotoxin and a potential carcinogen in both animal and human models