The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I would argue that a muscle Centric view could potentially be the most important view because when your movement stops everything else deteriorates with it so you know people say well you know what would that have to do with heart health or brain health I would argue it has everything to do with heart health or brain health when a person becomes sedentary everything deteriorates in its wake
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
when your movement stops everything else deteriorates with it so you know people say well you know what would that have to do with health or brain health I would argue it has everything to do with heart health or brain health when a person becomes sedentary everything deteriorates in its wake of course your cardiovascular system will deteriorate at an accelerated rate of course we know unequivocally your brain will erode at an accelerated rate when you become inactive