The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a lot of these things that people have wound up in prison for are really impulsive horrible decisions as opposed to decades of sinister planning like it's one thing to look at what you know like Hitler did it's hard to argue that anything that he did that was bad was impulsive it's quite another thing when you look at someone in a gang-related incident where you know this guy gets shot and you're gonna shoot this guy back or this guy's about to shoot you and you shoot him
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.