The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What about ALS? Right? Not for speech, but for respiratory function, right? So, a patient with ALS is I assume it's I I don't actually, believe it or not, know much about it, but I assume that they ultimately succumb to respiratory complications and and whether it be aspirations or things like that. So, so if we could if we could overcome that problem and bypass the degenerative motor neurons, is there an engineering solution
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.