The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so gliadin had an anti-proliferative effect it was associated with intracellular oxidative imbalance characterized by an increased presence of lipid peroxides augmented oxidized relative to reduced glutathione i've talked about that a lot and a loss in protein protein-bound self-hydral groups not a good thing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
here's an in vitro cytotoxic effect of weak gliadin derived peptides on kco2 intestinal cell line and it's associated with intracellular oxidative imbalance implications for celiac disease