The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
80 percent of them are caused by what we refer to as garden variety chronic open angle glaucoma which means that it's the the glaucoma is not a function of the anatomy of the front of the eye being too crowded where the fluid can't get out it's more a problem of over production of fluid inside the eye and the pressure is too high inside the eye
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.