The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's this microvascular disease that is really a big driver here and there's a very compelling rationale for that you mentioned it earlier it's very hard to make it into your seventh eighth ninth decade without unbelievable amounts of microvascular damage and to your point if a critical mass of that is reached it's quite likely that that's going to result in the cognitive impairment and ultimately even higher levels of impairment beyond memory such as executive function
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's this microvascular disease that is really a big driver here and there's a very compelling rationale for that you mentioned it earlier it's very hard to make it into your seventh eighth ninth decade without unbelievable amounts of microvascular damage and to your point if a critical mass of that is reached it's quite likely that that's going to result in the cognitive impairment and ultimately even higher levels of impairment beyond memory such as executive function