The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
was there any evidence that variability in blood glucose per se beyond the average so if you have someone whose average blood glucose is a hundred plus or minus ten or fifteen versus someone who's a hundred plus or minus thirty is there a difference well the hemoglobin a1c would give you the same answer and even the average glucose does and I believe I found some data that suggested that cognition was impaired during developmental years by higher variability
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.