The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what about an immune response yeah that's I was gonna say if you take a disease like Kawasaki's and children we know that that's a disease that is mediated by some sort of immune response we don't know to all themes here like Ovid 19 is somehow provoking this response in this very very small subset of children that certainly leads to consequences in the heart the long-term consequences are again so you can certainly imagine scenarios like that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.