Peter Attia· MD
they looked at how these patients did over the subsequent what was it 20 years roughly 15 to 20 years based on the number of healthy lifestyle factors they engaged in
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they looked at how these patients did over the subsequent what was it 20 years roughly 15 to 20 years based on the number of healthy lifestyle factors they engaged in
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you look at something called the Chicago health and aging project it followed nearly 4 000 individuals who underwent regular clinical and cognitive assessment from the early 90s to about 2012