The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What about with visual? You know, as people get older and they develop cataracts or things of those nature, um, and their visual acuity goes down, does it have the same effect on depriving them of, uh, enough neural stimulation to to maintain or is it not as much because it's not a language issue? It's not as much. Yeah.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.