Peter Attia· MD
the inflammation was so key for each age group right like even more than all this other stuff like that I've thought about like senescence and telomeres and low blood glucose levels and all that stuff
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the inflammation was so key for each age group right like even more than all this other stuff like that I've thought about like senescence and telomeres and low blood glucose levels and all that stuff
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and it also predicted cognitive function. So people were more cognitively aware and they didn't have neurogenerative disease as well if they were able to have low inflammation.