The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, you know, there was a really interesting test developed by Professor Milan Fiala at UCLA, developed about almost 10 years ago now. And what he was looking at was taking peripheral blood mononuclear cells, so you're essentially taking the blood macrophages, and you're now simply challenging them. He would give them amyloid, and just look to see how good are they at phagocytosing, at eating and getting rid of the amyloid.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.