The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
people think if we measure 24s hydroxy cholesterol in the bloodstream and it's high we know the brain's trying to get rid of cholesterol and it's a marker of brain cholesterol health because you really should have trivial amounts of that in the bloodstream and it is with mass spectrometry easily measurable
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.