The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was a paper that just came out the other day and from out of British Columbia Canada looking at carefully looking a survival for GBM they said is woefully similar to the 1926 Bailey and Cushing paper for chrissake I mean what's going on here you mean in a hundred you almost 100 years John McCain size twelve months that's no different than if he had the cancer then if he had the tumor in 1926
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.