The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and there's increasing evidence that says that sub-concussive um impacts or blasts so an example would be sniper fire right you essentially have a mini explosion happening right next to your head several times a day right if you're if you're in the range practicing and there's some evidence that suggests that even that over time the damage can accumulate and cause issues with cognitive function
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but you know each individual one would you wouldn't be able to detect it really um but the damage seems to accumulate over time
and there's some evidence that suggest that even that over time the damage can accumulate and cause uh issues with cognitive function