The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
think about the opposite case of pellagra which is nice and deficiency mm-hmm where do you see that you see the if you're an optimist you say the three DS of dermatitis diarrhea and dementia if you're a pessimist you say the four DS and you include death and in the brain what's going on is nad is actually generating molecules that are directly involved in immediate neurotransmitter production
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.