The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and you'll start to pair back you know and so you'll end up with something that we call cognitive Frailty which basically means that your capacity for cognitive function is only as much you know it's basically the same as you use it every day there's no head route right there's no capacity to do more if you wanted to and then eventually you get so little capacity that you can do less and then doing less decreases capacity and you get the sort of feed forward cycle
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you'll end up with something that we call cognitive Frailty which basically means that your capacity for cognitive function is only as much you know it's basically the same as you use it every day there's no head route right there's no capacity to do more if you wanted to and then eventually you get so little capacity that you can do less and then doing less decreases capacity and you get the sort of feed forward cycle
all the data support that if you stop using the brain the same thing happens right Metabolic resources are redistributed you you don't you don't need to support those those same Connections in the brain because they're not being used and you'll start to pair back you know