The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there may be amyloid and tau and there are different types of plaques and different types of neurofibrillary tangles but generally when we try and get rid of these plaques these neurodegenerative conditions don't get better so it's a very good analogy to the LDL thing that there's something else going on there under the surface and they may be even be responding to an injury and that's why we see them but they're not causing it from what I can tell either
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.