Peter Attia· MD
it would just be very hard to imagine that senescence is not playing a role in aspects of cognition loss as we age
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it would just be very hard to imagine that senescence is not playing a role in aspects of cognition loss as we age
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
all of the work we've done over the last eight years everything going from the mutant animals to the wild-type animals to human data in osteoarthritis and now moving into human data soon with in the eye it would just be very hard to imagine that senescence is not playing a role in aspects of cognition loss as we age
there could be very few greater contributions that myself and my colleagues could make than making a contribution there because it has been an unsolved problem and scourge to humanity