The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it is a part of everyone's life whether they are aware of it or not that's the importance of it right in in the in the spirit of what water is to a fish as david foster wallace spoke about in his commencement speech whether you are conscious or unconscious of this thing it is with you so we are probably better off being conscious of it and having some measure of control and thought around it than we are ignoring it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.