The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So when you say okay it only took two months but you worked really really really hard actually probably four three to four three to four okay so then we're talking about like 100 days or so like really really running against those patterns and making new patterns and then it feels different
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think 3 months to totally change but that's 3 months of work work right yeah it's it's that same theory that matter is not evenly distributed change has not happen in a linear way you know okay it's only 3 months but you had to run countercurrent to patterns of neurotransmission that were inside of you for years and years and years and years