Peter Attia· MD
the Yerkes Dodson arousing arousal curve right which basically says that there's this u-shape or inverted U-shaped curve of like how aroused you are and how you perform and that curve is different based on the sport
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the Yerkes Dodson arousing arousal curve right which basically says that there's this u-shape or inverted U-shaped curve of like how aroused you are and how you perform and that curve is different based on the sport
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.