Peter Attia· MD
so i think that's quite interesting way to think about the subjective experiences but yeah i mean there's quite a lot of neuroimaging work um being done
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so i think that's quite interesting way to think about the subjective experiences but yeah i mean there's quite a lot of neuroimaging work um being done
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
um and there's some work showing that ketamine basically disrupts there's a bit of the tortilla prefrontal cortex so sort of in your prefrontal cortex but a bit back and a bit to the side um that's really associated with this prediction error processing and that's disrupted with ketamine so things that aren't surprising become surprising the things that shouldn't be surprising and are completely predictable and things that aren't predictable are no longer surprising so basically kind of noisy signal