The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you are allowing then things from circulation to get in the brain cause which you know WS havoc on the brain and sort of leads to this vicious cycle of neuroinflammation inflammation in the brain but also um you're disrupting the transport of important nutrients oxygen you know glucose I mean blood flow is disrupted to the brain as well
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
well presumably the leakier that barrier is the more things that maybe we evolved to not have crossed that barrier do indeed cross and perhaps that's a part of what you just said right which is this increase in inflammation that is now coupled with an inability or a decreased ability to to clear out debris