The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i actually have seen some interesting literature and i'm sure you've seen even more of it that suggests that this is you know if you look at the microvasculature in the eye it might be one of the earliest warning signs of when things go awry and so in an ideal world i would love it if you know we had you know tech that basically allowed for quick and easy evaluation of that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I I Believe by the way Zach that retinal examination should be a part of medicine today for everybody I I would take a retinal exam over a hemoglobin A1c all day every day I'd never look at another A1C again if I could see the retina of every one of my patients