The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but then in the 2017 paper they actually took a Next Step which was the Insight that where exactly the thing that we were focusing on was in a sentence what was before and after the actual ordering of it mattered not just the simple cooccurrence that knowing what position that word was in a sentence actually made the difference that paper showed the performance went way up in terms of recognition and that Transformer architecture came from that paper
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.