The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
now that was kind of a useless ability frankly um I don't know that's not that sounds like a more useful ability than being able to integrate faces well it helped me learn certain things but I think ultimately being fairly narrow context and being able to access these these broader rule sets and come up with new rule sets is incredibly powerful
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.