The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you looked at them from the outside notwithstanding sort of the criminal side of what was going on with there and you know they could tie their shoes and walk around so you wouldn't look at them and say Well they're you know they don't look like someone who's in the last stages of Alzheimer's disease but if you understand their behavior their moods and what people who are around them would say
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.