The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then having the things that you need in terms of nutrients um you also want the absence of toxins that might prevent your ability to to adapt so that's where we think about pollution maybe heavy metal heavy metals maybe infections and inflammation right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and then you also want the absence of toxins that might prevent your ability to adapt so that's where we think about pollution maybe heavy metal heavy metals maybe infections and inflammation right