The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there probably are some pathological changes and whether we use the term pathology or not is probably controversial but there are some AG related changes that are occurring that are also for lack of a better thinking in our analogy slowing down our librarian reducing our librarian's vision you know some some some way that makes it actually more complicated for us to do these things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.