The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in any event you can get a sense of which brain areas are active and when with fairly high spatial resolution fairly high and pretty good temporal resolution on the order of hundreds of milliseconds not but it's not Ultra Ultra fast because a lot of neural transmission is happening on the you know tens of milliseconds especially when you're in talking about auditory processing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.